apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From r..@apache.org
Subject Re: perchild under Solaris 8
Date Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:52:43 GMT
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> At 11:07 AM -0700 9/10/02, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:07:30PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure
> >> process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and
> >> result in a binary that actually serves content!! Haven't yet
> >> playing with using the actual uid/gid aspects of perchild yet.
> >>
> >> I'm looking to see what affects, if any, adding these by default to
> >> APR and httpd will be... If anyone has some better experience with
> >> these, please let me know :)
> >
> >If that combo works, great, but I have a feeling it will break some
> >other things. I have a combo somewhere around here that I am using on
> >another module that allows solaris to expose the same file descriptor
> >passing semantics, let me see if I can find it.
> >
> I'm also concerned about breakage... Thing is, we're using msghdr for
> the recvmsg() calls.

Yeah, I don't think Solaris uses the same structure/functions for passing
fd's between processes.  I had originally planned to use a Solaris box for
the second port, but I don't have access to one yet.  I keep looking on
e-bay  for a good x86 box though.


Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
550 Jean St
Oakland CA 94610

View raw message