apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sander Striker" <stri...@apache.org>
Subject RE: library versioning name
Date Mon, 16 Sep 2002 22:54:33 GMT
> From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:pier@betaversion.org]
> Sent: 17 September 2002 00:36

> On 16/9/02 23:15, "rbb@apache.org" <rbb@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Why did we choose libapr-#.so?  Most other libraries use libapr.so.#,
> > which allows you to continue to do -lapr.  Is there a reason we chose to
> > do something different???
> 
> Sgrunf???? Whatchasaying Ryan?
> 
> $ ls -1a /opt/apache/lib/libapr*
> /opt/apache/lib/libapr.a
> /opt/apache/lib/libapr.la
> /opt/apache/lib/libapr.so -> libapr.so.0.0.0
> /opt/apache/lib/libapr.so.0 -> libapr.so.0.0.0
> /opt/apache/lib/libapr.so.0.0.0
> /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.a
> /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.la
> /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.so -> libaprutil.so.0.0.0
> /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.so.0 -> libaprutil.so.0.0.0
> /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.so.0.0.0
> $ 
> 
> Unless something changed in the past 3 weeks, this is how it works with
> Apache...

I hate to say it, but something changed the past 3 weeks... ;)

Sander


Mime
View raw message