apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pier Fumagalli <p...@betaversion.org>
Subject Re: library versioning name
Date Mon, 16 Sep 2002 22:46:35 GMT
On 16/9/02 23:54, "Sander Striker" <striker@apache.org> wrote:

>> From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:pier@betaversion.org]
>> Sent: 17 September 2002 00:36
> 
>> On 16/9/02 23:15, "rbb@apache.org" <rbb@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Why did we choose libapr-#.so?  Most other libraries use libapr.so.#,
>>> which allows you to continue to do -lapr.  Is there a reason we chose to
>>> do something different???
>> 
>> Sgrunf???? Whatchasaying Ryan?
>> 
>> $ ls -1a /opt/apache/lib/libapr*
>> /opt/apache/lib/libapr.a
>> /opt/apache/lib/libapr.la
>> /opt/apache/lib/libapr.so -> libapr.so.0.0.0
>> /opt/apache/lib/libapr.so.0 -> libapr.so.0.0.0
>> /opt/apache/lib/libapr.so.0.0.0
>> /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.a
>> /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.la
>> /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.so -> libaprutil.so.0.0.0
>> /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.so.0 -> libaprutil.so.0.0.0
>> /opt/apache/lib/libaprutil.so.0.0.0
>> $ 
>> 
>> Unless something changed in the past 3 weeks, this is how it works with
>> Apache...
> 
> I hate to say it, but something changed the past 3 weeks... ;)

Sorry, was out of touch for a while... My main BetaVersion server and the
backup one (friggin' Intel hardware) both died... Lost approximately 3 weeks
of email, the WebApp/Jerry module source code (all of it), and other random
bits and bobs... :-/

Didn't know, my bad! :)

    Pier (explaining also his silence of the past month or so)


Mime
View raw message