From dev-return-7835-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Tue Aug 27 16:58:25 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 31311 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2002 16:58:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 31293 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2002 16:58:25 -0000 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:58:25 -0700 From: Aaron Bannert To: Jon Travis Cc: Jim Jagielski , Ryan Bloom , Justin Erenkrantz , dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: El-Kabong -- HTML Parser Message-ID: <20020827165825.GT13980@clove.org> Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bannert , Jon Travis , Jim Jagielski , Ryan Bloom , Justin Erenkrantz , dev@apr.apache.org References: <20020827162322.GO13980@clove.org> <200208271643.MAA02935@devsys.jaguNET.com> <20020827095448.A31554@covalent.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020827095448.A31554@covalent.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I don't understand. Is there something in httpd that would need el-kabong? Flood could definately use it, but I really don't want to make flood dependent on both httpd and APR, especially when flood is a _client_ and the httpd _server_ project is a server. HTML is more general than server-side HTTP, IMHO. -aaron On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:54:48AM -0700, Jon Travis wrote: > I personally think it belongs as some kind of sub-project to httpd, but > not in the same tree. > > -- Jon > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:43:17PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:02:47AM -0400, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > > I would prefer that this became it's own project either under the httpd > > > > project or the APR project. I don't believe that it should be a part of > > > > the APR-util library however. > > > > > > The functionality provided by el-kabong seems like a good fit within APR. > > > I think it would be fine if el-kabong became a new subproject of APR. > > > > > > > Personally, I think it's very cool that E-K is being folded into the > > ASF. I think the httpd project is a better fit however, simply > > because APR should be protocol ignorant. > > > > -- > > =========================================================================== > > Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ > > "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order > > will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson