apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apr-site versioning.html
Date Tue, 13 Aug 2002 19:02:19 GMT
At 2:54 PM -0400 8/13/02, rbb@apache.org wrote:
> >
>> Toward the end of that last round of discussions, I thus proposed
>> that APR get out of the business of managing microseconds:
>>
>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apr-dev&m=102678180413988
>>
>> I'm interested in hearing people's comments on that proposal.
>
>Doesn't that completely ignore Cliff's message early in this thread that
>specifically stated that he needed microsecond resolution?

Agreed. Just because Apache doesn't necessarily use/need it, is no
reason to not include that in APR.

>I continue to state that APR's time format should stay as it is.  If you
>want seconds, use time_t.  The only change that I can see as appropriate,
>is to make the interval_time_t a 32-bit value, which would mean that any
>arithmetic on the intervals would be faster. 

Agreed here as well (regarding making the interval a 32 bit).
-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Mime
View raw message