apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Stoddard" <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject RE: cvs commit: apr-site versioning.html
Date Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:59:46 GMT

> > >I have a better question.  Has anybody come up with a design
> that we can
> > >agree on for this?  If there is no design, then we really
> can't solve the
> > >problem quickly.  The last I saw about this issue, nobody
> agreed on how to
> > >fix it, or even that there was a real problem.
> > >
> >
> > There were a few promising solutions, but all of them had one
> > technical problem or another.  Basically, each of the proposals
> > performed well for some set of operations but poorly for at least
> > one other operation that might be important to some application.
> >
> > Toward the end of that last round of discussions, I thus proposed
> > that APR get out of the business of managing microseconds:
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apr-dev&m=102678180413988
> >
> > I'm interested in hearing people's comments on that proposal.
>
> Doesn't that completely ignore Cliff's message early in this thread that
> specifically stated that he needed microsecond resolution?

Go read the post in detail. microsecond resolution is available. It is just
stored in a different field.

I am +0 on the proposal pending further mastication :-)

Bill


Mime
View raw message