apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apr-site versioning.html
Date Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:09:34 GMT
At 02:02 PM 8/13/2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 rbb@apache.org wrote:
>
> > I continue to state that APR's time format should stay as it is.  If you
> > want seconds, use time_t.
>
>Agreed.

And agreed here too.

> > Doesn't that completely ignore Cliff's message early in this thread that
> > specifically stated that he needed microsecond resolution?
>
>As long as there's an apr_time_now_in_microseconds() and I'm allowed to
>determine intervals somehow (which I'm now doing by subtracting two time
>values), I could care less what else happens.

How is THAT :-?

apr_time_now() should continue to return an apr_time_t value.

If you want seconds, call time() [posix, quite portable].

Bill
[not quite back from vacation, but back to civilization]



Mime
View raw message