apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>
Subject Re: El-Kabong -- HTML Parser
Date Thu, 29 Aug 2002 18:29:24 GMT
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:24:28PM -0400, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > +1 from me, I prefer APR actually.
> 
> I am really uncomfortable with this going under the APR project.  As
> things stand right now, it just doesn't fit with what we have stated our
> goals to be.
> 
> If you want to change our stated goals, then go ahead and do it.  Just
> committing code that doesn't fit with our goals isn't the way to do that.

(I will defer answering this for an apr-only discussion.)

> I will make one exception to that statement.  If it lands inside of
> APR-util, under the XML directory, and it is made to work with the XML
> parser, I can accept that landing spot.  As it fits in closer with our
> goals (I think).  Jim, I can't decide if this is what you meant or not.

I'm +1 on integrating it into our XML stuff. I consider it to be
equivalent to apr-util, so either we put it inside apr-util, or
we create a new APR subproject or sub-library for it.

-aaron

Mime
View raw message