apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>
Subject Re: El-Kabong -- HTML Parser
Date Tue, 27 Aug 2002 17:43:43 GMT
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:15:38AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Umm, I think Jon just meant that it belongs as a subproject of
> httpd.  I agree with that - it doesn't belong in APR.  And, yes,
> I believe that httpd-2.0 can use el-kabong (much in the manner
> that Daniel described).

Sure, httpd can use el-kabong, but does it need it _today_? Flood
could use it today. Other than flood, are there any other projects
that could use it _today_?

> Yes, I extend the focus of httpd to include clients as well.
> flood's there.  So should serf and (possibly) el-kabong.

Flood is there to test the server. Serf is a (nonexistant) client
library, initially slated for HTTP but not necessarily protocol
specific. They are both in the correct places.

> To me, APR is only about raw system-level portability - not about
> producing portable libraries.  I'm confused how that got distorted
> the way it has.  -- justin

APR is whatever we want it to be. If we start building things on
top of APR that are functionally distinct from other projects under
the ASF, then I believe it makes sense to keep them as subprojects
of APR. Either we extend the meaning of APR to mean "any portable
libraries" or we take away the "server" in "HTTP Server Project".


View raw message