apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ryan Bloom" <...@covalent.net>
Subject RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/build httpd_roll_release
Date Thu, 01 Aug 2002 20:32:38 GMT
> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net]
> 
> At 11:42 AM 8/1/2002, you wrote:
> >ianh        2002/08/01 09:42:33
> >
> >   Modified:    build    httpd_roll_release
> >   Log:
> >   we need apr-iconv now
> 
> Even if we don't build it, this is extremely good practice that the
folks
> rolling and releasing the tarball TAG the apr-iconv tree in sync with
> the current apr and apr-util trees..

I completely disagree.  The problem is that the httpd_roll_release
script is for rolling httpd releases, not APR releases.  This change
doesn't help people realize that they have to tag APR-iconv before they
can release httpd.  I really agree with Cliff, the change to pull
apr-iconv out of APR is annoying, and it is going to cause problems.  I
understand that it is the "best" solution we have right now, it is still
a bad solution.

Ryan




Mime
View raw message