| Ryan Bloom |
apr_poll() done. |
Thu, 11 Jul, 06:35 |
|
Re: cvs commit: apr/poll/os2 Makefile.in poll.c |
|
| Brian Havard |
Re: cvs commit: apr/poll/os2 Makefile.in poll.c |
Thu, 11 Jul, 11:42 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: cvs commit: apr/poll/os2 Makefile.in poll.c |
Thu, 11 Jul, 13:42 |
|
RE: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only |
|
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only |
Thu, 11 Jul, 14:04 |
| Jim Jagielski |
Re: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only |
Thu, 11 Jul, 14:27 |
| Greg Marr |
Re: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only |
Thu, 11 Jul, 14:56 |
| Brian Pane |
RE: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only |
Thu, 11 Jul, 16:31 |
| Bill Stoddard |
RE: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only |
Thu, 11 Jul, 13:58 |
| Brian Pane |
RE: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only |
Thu, 11 Jul, 15:41 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
RE: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only |
Thu, 11 Jul, 16:10 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
[PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion |
Thu, 11 Jul, 18:49 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: [PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion |
Thu, 11 Jul, 19:31 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: [PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion |
Thu, 11 Jul, 21:19 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: [PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion |
Thu, 11 Jul, 23:13 |
| Greg Marr |
Re: [PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion |
Thu, 11 Jul, 19:18 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: [PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion |
Thu, 11 Jul, 21:28 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only |
Thu, 11 Jul, 16:33 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only |
Thu, 11 Jul, 17:33 |
|
Re: cvs commit: apr/test sendfile.c server.c testfile.c testpoll.c |
|
| Jeff Trawick |
Re: cvs commit: apr/test sendfile.c server.c testfile.c testpoll.c |
Thu, 11 Jul, 15:02 |
|
Re: cvs commit: apr/support/unix waitio.c |
|
| r..@apache.org |
Re: cvs commit: apr/support/unix waitio.c |
Thu, 11 Jul, 15:10 |
| Bill Stoddard |
RE: cvs commit: apr/support/unix waitio.c |
Thu, 11 Jul, 16:29 |
|
Re: cvs commit: apr/poll/unix pollacc.c Makefile.in poll.c |
|
| Brian Havard |
Re: cvs commit: apr/poll/unix pollacc.c Makefile.in poll.c |
Thu, 11 Jul, 16:01 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: cvs commit: apr/poll/unix pollacc.c Makefile.in poll.c |
Thu, 11 Jul, 16:17 |
|
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
|
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Thu, 11 Jul, 19:06 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Thu, 11 Jul, 19:19 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Thu, 11 Jul, 19:20 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Thu, 11 Jul, 19:35 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Thu, 11 Jul, 19:57 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Thu, 11 Jul, 20:37 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Thu, 11 Jul, 22:13 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Thu, 11 Jul, 22:20 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Thu, 11 Jul, 22:45 |
| Greg Stein |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Sat, 13 Jul, 01:34 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Thu, 11 Jul, 21:34 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Thu, 11 Jul, 23:45 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Thu, 11 Jul, 23:47 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Thu, 11 Jul, 23:50 |
| James Cox |
RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Thu, 11 Jul, 23:58 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 00:22 |
| Brian Pane |
RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 15:29 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 00:31 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 00:34 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 04:55 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 17:09 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 18:16 |
| Roy T. Fielding |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 01:00 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 01:05 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 01:29 |
| Roy T. Fielding |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 02:19 |
| Sander Striker |
RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 07:14 |
| Roy T. Fielding |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 07:57 |
| James Cox |
RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 08:41 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 16:47 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 17:29 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Fri, 12 Jul, 17:56 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Sat, 13 Jul, 02:05 |
| Roy T. Fielding |
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS |
Sat, 13 Jul, 02:39 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: [PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion |
Thu, 11 Jul, 19:13 |
| Greg Marr |
Fwd: Re: [PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion |
Thu, 11 Jul, 20:02 |
| Nuutti Kotivuori |
[PATCH] Test cases for apr_vformatter and apr_snprintf |
Thu, 11 Jul, 20:05 |
| Jim Jagielski |
Re: [PATCH] Test cases for apr_vformatter and apr_snprintf |
Fri, 12 Jul, 00:17 |
| Dirk-Willem van Gulik |
POLL havoc |
Thu, 11 Jul, 20:24 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: POLL havoc |
Thu, 11 Jul, 19:53 |
| di...@covalent.net |
RE: POLL havoc |
Thu, 11 Jul, 19:55 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: POLL havoc |
Thu, 11 Jul, 19:59 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: POLL havoc |
Thu, 11 Jul, 19:58 |
| di...@covalent.net |
More recent ./configure entertainment |
Thu, 11 Jul, 20:31 |
| Pier Fumagalli |
Re: More recent ./configure entertainment |
Thu, 11 Jul, 21:17 |
| di...@covalent.net |
Re: More recent ./configure entertainment |
Thu, 11 Jul, 21:25 |
| Roy T. Fielding |
why apr_size_t? |
Thu, 11 Jul, 22:24 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: why apr_size_t? |
Fri, 12 Jul, 15:12 |
| Roy T. Fielding |
Re: why apr_size_t? |
Fri, 12 Jul, 19:18 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Votes - majority or consensus? |
Fri, 12 Jul, 01:35 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: Votes - majority or consensus? |
Fri, 12 Jul, 02:12 |
| Ryan Bloom |
New test suite, decision made. |
Fri, 12 Jul, 17:02 |
| Ben Collins-Sussman |
Re: New test suite, decision made. |
Fri, 12 Jul, 17:08 |
|
Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) |
|
| David Reid |
Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) |
Fri, 12 Jul, 18:47 |
| Aaron Bannert |
[VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) |
Fri, 12 Jul, 18:36 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) |
Fri, 12 Jul, 18:42 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) |
Fri, 12 Jul, 18:46 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
[SUMMARY] time discussion |
Fri, 12 Jul, 19:09 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: [SUMMARY] time discussion |
Fri, 12 Jul, 19:42 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: [SUMMARY] time discussion |
Fri, 12 Jul, 21:07 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) |
Fri, 12 Jul, 19:15 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) |
Fri, 12 Jul, 19:41 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) |
Fri, 12 Jul, 20:08 |
| 'Aaron Bannert' |
Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) |
Fri, 12 Jul, 20:13 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) |
Fri, 12 Jul, 18:57 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) |
Fri, 12 Jul, 21:03 |
|
RE: cvs commit: apr-util/buckets apr_buckets_pipe.c |
|
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: cvs commit: apr-util/buckets apr_buckets_pipe.c |
Fri, 12 Jul, 18:58 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: cvs commit: apr-util/buckets apr_buckets_pipe.c |
Fri, 12 Jul, 19:02 |
| Bill Stoddard |
RE: cvs commit: apr-util/buckets apr_buckets_pipe.c |
Fri, 12 Jul, 19:16 |
| Brad Nicholes |
Re: cvs commit: apr-util/buckets apr_buckets_pipe.c |
Fri, 12 Jul, 19:27 |
|
Re: [SUMMARY] time discussion |
|
| Jim Jagielski |
Re: [SUMMARY] time discussion |
Fri, 12 Jul, 19:21 |
| Roy T. Fielding |
Re: [SUMMARY] time discussion |
Sat, 13 Jul, 03:48 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
[PATCH] Support buffering on apr_os_file_put |
Sat, 13 Jul, 02:57 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: [PATCH] Support buffering on apr_os_file_put |
Sat, 13 Jul, 03:16 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: [PATCH] Support buffering on apr_os_file_put |
Sat, 13 Jul, 03:17 |
| Brian Pane |
[PATCH] updated code to select default atomic ops |
Sat, 13 Jul, 03:43 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: [PATCH] updated code to select default atomic ops |
Sat, 13 Jul, 03:58 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: [PATCH] updated code to select default atomic ops |
Sat, 13 Jul, 04:17 |
|
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
|
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 05:44 |
| Brian Pane |
more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 05:39 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 06:24 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 06:28 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 05:50 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 06:12 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 06:22 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 05:55 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 06:14 |
| Jim Jagielski |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 13:26 |
| Jim Jagielski |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 13:27 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 16:16 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 16:19 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 16:35 |
| 'Aaron Bannert' |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 16:45 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 17:32 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 18:07 |
| 'Aaron Bannert' |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 18:19 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sun, 14 Jul, 19:30 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 02:20 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 02:54 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 03:23 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 03:05 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 03:38 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 03:36 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 03:42 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 04:56 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 05:09 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 18:47 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 18:02 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sat, 13 Jul, 16:13 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sun, 14 Jul, 18:25 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sun, 14 Jul, 18:36 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sun, 14 Jul, 19:56 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sun, 14 Jul, 19:57 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sun, 14 Jul, 20:19 |
| Cliff Woolley |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sun, 14 Jul, 20:01 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sun, 14 Jul, 20:36 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sun, 14 Jul, 20:41 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sun, 14 Jul, 20:21 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sun, 14 Jul, 20:39 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 02:03 |
| Sander Striker |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Sun, 14 Jul, 20:39 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 00:30 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 03:09 |
| r..@apache.org |
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 03:30 |
| Emery Berger |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 03:40 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 04:41 |
| Bill Stoddard |
RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue |
Mon, 15 Jul, 14:54 |
|
Re: cvs commit: apr/tables apr_tables.c |
|
| Brian Pane |
Re: cvs commit: apr/tables apr_tables.c |
Sat, 13 Jul, 07:13 |
| Jeff Trawick |
Re: cvs commit: apr/tables apr_tables.c |
Sat, 13 Jul, 11:45 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: cvs commit: apr/tables apr_tables.c |
Sat, 13 Jul, 18:09 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
For what it's worth, our busec implementation |
Sat, 13 Jul, 23:56 |
| Brian Pane |
[PATCH for review and benchmarking] new implementation of apr_table |
Sun, 14 Jul, 01:59 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: [PATCH for review and benchmarking] new implementation of apr_table |
Sun, 14 Jul, 23:30 |
| Ian Holsman |
IO abstraction layer for files |
Mon, 15 Jul, 00:53 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: IO abstraction layer for files |
Mon, 15 Jul, 02:03 |
| Ian Holsman |
Re: IO abstraction layer for files |
Mon, 15 Jul, 05:27 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 02:24 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 02:27 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 02:35 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 02:42 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 03:56 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 04:24 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 04:03 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Why not POSIX timeval? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 04:37 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Faster time_now() [Was: Why not POSIX time_t?] |
Mon, 15 Jul, 05:04 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 03:03 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 03:03 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 03:17 |
| r..@apache.org |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 05:23 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 05:57 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 13:55 |
| Bill Stoddard |
RE: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 14:16 |
| Bill Stoddard |
RE: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 14:38 |
| David Reid |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 15:00 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 15:29 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 15:08 |
| Jim Jagielski |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 15:36 |
| Bill Stoddard |
RE: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 17:32 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 18:19 |
| Cliff Woolley |
RE: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 17:54 |
| Bill Stoddard |
RE: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 18:04 |
| Bill Stoddard |
RE: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 18:37 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 19:15 |
| Cliff Woolley |
RE: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 19:48 |
| Brian Pane |
approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 20:21 |
| Ben Laurie |
Re: approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Tue, 16 Jul, 13:51 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Tue, 16 Jul, 15:45 |
| Justin Erenkrantz |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 20:44 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 20:34 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 18:53 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 19:29 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 19:55 |
| Cliff Woolley |
RE: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 19:53 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 19:58 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 19:56 |
| Cliff Woolley |
RE: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 19:59 |
| Aaron Bannert |
[PATCH] possible optimization in apr_poll()? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 03:48 |
| Ryan Bloom |
Re: [PATCH] possible optimization in apr_poll()? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 04:34 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: [PATCH] possible optimization in apr_poll()? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 04:42 |
| r..@apache.org |
Re: [PATCH] possible optimization in apr_poll()? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 04:43 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: [PATCH] possible optimization in apr_poll()? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 04:51 |
| Bill Stoddard |
RE: [PATCH] possible optimization in apr_poll()? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 14:51 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: [PATCH] possible optimization in apr_poll()? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 15:06 |
| r..@apache.org |
Re: Why not POSIX timeval? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 04:38 |
| Karl Fogel |
[PATCH] identity tables for i18n (second chance for review) |
Mon, 15 Jul, 04:59 |
| Ryan Bloom |
Re: Faster time_now() [Was: Why not POSIX time_t?] |
Mon, 15 Jul, 05:20 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: cvs commit: apr/network_io/win32 sendrecv.c |
Mon, 15 Jul, 13:49 |
| Ian Holsman |
ANNOUNCE : 2.0.40 is tagged |
Mon, 15 Jul, 16:26 |
| Brad Nicholes |
network_io/win32/poll.c |
Mon, 15 Jul, 17:09 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: network_io/win32/poll.c |
Mon, 15 Jul, 17:16 |
| Brad Nicholes |
RE: network_io/win32/poll.c |
Mon, 15 Jul, 17:21 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: network_io/win32/poll.c |
Mon, 15 Jul, 17:22 |
| Branko Čibej |
Warnings in new poll code on Win32 |
Mon, 15 Jul, 17:52 |
| Ed Holyat |
[PATCH] unix/dso.c on solaris |
Mon, 15 Jul, 19:22 |
| Jeff Trawick |
Re: [PATCH] unix/dso.c on solaris |
Thu, 18 Jul, 14:25 |
|
Re: approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
|
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 20:24 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 20:32 |
| Bill Stoddard |
RE: approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Tue, 16 Jul, 17:00 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t? |
Tue, 16 Jul, 17:27 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Removing timeout_ms field from win32 struct |
Mon, 15 Jul, 20:40 |
| David Reid |
Earth to APR???? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 23:36 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: Earth to APR???? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 23:36 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: Earth to APR???? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 23:45 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: Earth to APR???? |
Mon, 15 Jul, 23:49 |
| Brian Pane |
a new proposal Re: Earth to APR???? |
Tue, 16 Jul, 00:35 |
| Jim Jagielski |
Re: Earth to APR???? |
Tue, 16 Jul, 00:06 |
| Aaron Bannert |
Re: Earth to APR???? |
Tue, 16 Jul, 04:03 |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. |
Re: Earth to APR???? |
Tue, 16 Jul, 04:09 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: Earth to APR???? |
Tue, 16 Jul, 06:23 |
| Jim Jagielski |
Re: Earth to APR???? |
Tue, 16 Jul, 12:38 |
| Ryan Bloom |
RE: a new proposal Re: Earth to APR???? |
Tue, 16 Jul, 00:21 |
| Brian Pane |
Re: a new proposal Re: Earth to APR???? |
Tue, 16 Jul, 16:02 |
| Karl Fogel |
bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' |
Tue, 16 Jul, 02:12 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' |
Tue, 16 Jul, 02:28 |
| Karl Fogel |
Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' |
Tue, 16 Jul, 03:27 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' |
Tue, 16 Jul, 03:55 |
| Karl Fogel |
Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' |
Tue, 16 Jul, 03:58 |
| Ian Holsman |
Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' |
Tue, 16 Jul, 04:12 |
| Karl Fogel |
Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' |
Tue, 16 Jul, 04:09 |
| Ian Holsman |
Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' |
Tue, 16 Jul, 05:11 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' |
Tue, 16 Jul, 04:41 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' |
Tue, 16 Jul, 04:52 |
| Karl Fogel |
Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' |
Tue, 16 Jul, 04:43 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' |
Tue, 16 Jul, 04:59 |
| Cliff Woolley |
Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' |
Tue, 16 Jul, 05:15 |