apr-dev mailing list archives: July 2002

Site index · List index
Message list« Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Ryan Bloom apr_poll() done. Thu, 11 Jul, 06:35
Re: cvs commit: apr/poll/os2 Makefile.in poll.c
Brian Havard   Re: cvs commit: apr/poll/os2 Makefile.in poll.c Thu, 11 Jul, 11:42
Ryan Bloom   RE: cvs commit: apr/poll/os2 Makefile.in poll.c Thu, 11 Jul, 13:42
RE: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only
Ryan Bloom   RE: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only Thu, 11 Jul, 14:04
Jim Jagielski   Re: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only Thu, 11 Jul, 14:27
Greg Marr   Re: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only Thu, 11 Jul, 14:56
Brian Pane   RE: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only Thu, 11 Jul, 16:31
Bill Stoddard     RE: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only Thu, 11 Jul, 13:58
Brian Pane       RE: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only Thu, 11 Jul, 15:41
William A. Rowe, Jr.       RE: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only Thu, 11 Jul, 16:10
William A. Rowe, Jr.       [PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion Thu, 11 Jul, 18:49
William A. Rowe, Jr.         Re: [PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion Thu, 11 Jul, 19:31
William A. Rowe, Jr.         Re: [PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion Thu, 11 Jul, 21:19
Brian Pane           Re: [PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion Thu, 11 Jul, 23:13
Greg Marr       Re: [PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion Thu, 11 Jul, 19:18
William A. Rowe, Jr.       Re: [PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion Thu, 11 Jul, 21:28
Ryan Bloom   RE: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only Thu, 11 Jul, 16:33
Cliff Woolley   Re: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only Thu, 11 Jul, 17:33
Re: cvs commit: apr/test sendfile.c server.c testfile.c testpoll.c
Jeff Trawick   Re: cvs commit: apr/test sendfile.c server.c testfile.c testpoll.c Thu, 11 Jul, 15:02
Re: cvs commit: apr/support/unix waitio.c
r..@apache.org   Re: cvs commit: apr/support/unix waitio.c Thu, 11 Jul, 15:10
Bill Stoddard   RE: cvs commit: apr/support/unix waitio.c Thu, 11 Jul, 16:29
Re: cvs commit: apr/poll/unix pollacc.c Makefile.in poll.c
Brian Havard   Re: cvs commit: apr/poll/unix pollacc.c Makefile.in poll.c Thu, 11 Jul, 16:01
Ryan Bloom   RE: cvs commit: apr/poll/unix pollacc.c Makefile.in poll.c Thu, 11 Jul, 16:17
Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS
William A. Rowe, Jr.   Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Thu, 11 Jul, 19:06
Brian Pane     Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Thu, 11 Jul, 19:19
Aaron Bannert   Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Thu, 11 Jul, 19:20
William A. Rowe, Jr.   Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Thu, 11 Jul, 19:35
Aaron Bannert     Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Thu, 11 Jul, 19:57
Brian Pane       Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Thu, 11 Jul, 20:37
Aaron Bannert         Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Thu, 11 Jul, 22:13
Ryan Bloom           RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS Thu, 11 Jul, 22:20
Brian Pane             Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Thu, 11 Jul, 22:45
Greg Stein             Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Sat, 13 Jul, 01:34
Cliff Woolley   Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Thu, 11 Jul, 21:34
Ryan Bloom   RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS Thu, 11 Jul, 23:45
Ryan Bloom   RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS Thu, 11 Jul, 23:47
Cliff Woolley   Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Thu, 11 Jul, 23:50
James Cox   RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS Thu, 11 Jul, 23:58
Ryan Bloom   RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 00:22
Brian Pane     RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 15:29
Aaron Bannert   Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 00:31
Justin Erenkrantz     Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 00:34
William A. Rowe, Jr.     Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 04:55
William A. Rowe, Jr.       RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 17:09
William A. Rowe, Jr.         RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 18:16
Roy T. Fielding   Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 01:00
William A. Rowe, Jr.   Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 01:05
Cliff Woolley   Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 01:29
Roy T. Fielding   Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 02:19
Sander Striker   RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 07:14
Roy T. Fielding   Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 07:57
James Cox   RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 08:41
Ryan Bloom   RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 16:47
Ryan Bloom   RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 17:29
Brian Pane     Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Fri, 12 Jul, 17:56
William A. Rowe, Jr.   Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Sat, 13 Jul, 02:05
Roy T. Fielding   Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS Sat, 13 Jul, 02:39
Brian Pane Re: [PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion Thu, 11 Jul, 19:13
Greg Marr Fwd: Re: [PATCH 3] example binary BUSEC for discussion Thu, 11 Jul, 20:02
Nuutti Kotivuori [PATCH] Test cases for apr_vformatter and apr_snprintf Thu, 11 Jul, 20:05
Jim Jagielski   Re: [PATCH] Test cases for apr_vformatter and apr_snprintf Fri, 12 Jul, 00:17
Dirk-Willem van Gulik POLL havoc Thu, 11 Jul, 20:24
Ryan Bloom   RE: POLL havoc Thu, 11 Jul, 19:53
di...@covalent.net     RE: POLL havoc Thu, 11 Jul, 19:55
Aaron Bannert       Re: POLL havoc Thu, 11 Jul, 19:59
Ryan Bloom   RE: POLL havoc Thu, 11 Jul, 19:58
di...@covalent.net More recent ./configure entertainment Thu, 11 Jul, 20:31
Pier Fumagalli   Re: More recent ./configure entertainment Thu, 11 Jul, 21:17
di...@covalent.net   Re: More recent ./configure entertainment Thu, 11 Jul, 21:25
Roy T. Fielding why apr_size_t? Thu, 11 Jul, 22:24
Cliff Woolley   Re: why apr_size_t? Fri, 12 Jul, 15:12
Roy T. Fielding   Re: why apr_size_t? Fri, 12 Jul, 19:18
Justin Erenkrantz Votes - majority or consensus? Fri, 12 Jul, 01:35
Cliff Woolley   Re: Votes - majority or consensus? Fri, 12 Jul, 02:12
Ryan Bloom New test suite, decision made. Fri, 12 Jul, 17:02
Ben Collins-Sussman   Re: New test suite, decision made. Fri, 12 Jul, 17:08
Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s)
David Reid   Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) Fri, 12 Jul, 18:47
Aaron Bannert     [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) Fri, 12 Jul, 18:36
Justin Erenkrantz       Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) Fri, 12 Jul, 18:42
Aaron Bannert         Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) Fri, 12 Jul, 18:46
William A. Rowe, Jr.         [SUMMARY] time discussion Fri, 12 Jul, 19:09
William A. Rowe, Jr.           Re: [SUMMARY] time discussion Fri, 12 Jul, 19:42
Justin Erenkrantz             Re: [SUMMARY] time discussion Fri, 12 Jul, 21:07
William A. Rowe, Jr.         Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) Fri, 12 Jul, 19:15
Aaron Bannert           Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) Fri, 12 Jul, 19:41
Ryan Bloom             RE: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) Fri, 12 Jul, 20:08
'Aaron Bannert'               Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) Fri, 12 Jul, 20:13
Aaron Bannert     Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) Fri, 12 Jul, 18:57
Ryan Bloom   RE: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) Fri, 12 Jul, 21:03
RE: cvs commit: apr-util/buckets apr_buckets_pipe.c
Ryan Bloom   RE: cvs commit: apr-util/buckets apr_buckets_pipe.c Fri, 12 Jul, 18:58
Cliff Woolley   Re: cvs commit: apr-util/buckets apr_buckets_pipe.c Fri, 12 Jul, 19:02
Bill Stoddard   RE: cvs commit: apr-util/buckets apr_buckets_pipe.c Fri, 12 Jul, 19:16
Brad Nicholes   Re: cvs commit: apr-util/buckets apr_buckets_pipe.c Fri, 12 Jul, 19:27
Re: [SUMMARY] time discussion
Jim Jagielski   Re: [SUMMARY] time discussion Fri, 12 Jul, 19:21
Roy T. Fielding   Re: [SUMMARY] time discussion Sat, 13 Jul, 03:48
Justin Erenkrantz [PATCH] Support buffering on apr_os_file_put Sat, 13 Jul, 02:57
Aaron Bannert   Re: [PATCH] Support buffering on apr_os_file_put Sat, 13 Jul, 03:16
Aaron Bannert     Re: [PATCH] Support buffering on apr_os_file_put Sat, 13 Jul, 03:17
Brian Pane [PATCH] updated code to select default atomic ops Sat, 13 Jul, 03:43
Justin Erenkrantz   Re: [PATCH] updated code to select default atomic ops Sat, 13 Jul, 03:58
Brian Pane     Re: [PATCH] updated code to select default atomic ops Sat, 13 Jul, 04:17
Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue
Justin Erenkrantz   Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 05:44
Brian Pane     more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 05:39
William A. Rowe, Jr.       Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 06:24
Aaron Bannert         Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 06:28
Brian Pane     Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 05:50
Justin Erenkrantz       Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 06:12
Brian Pane         Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 06:22
Aaron Bannert     Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 05:55
Justin Erenkrantz       Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 06:14
Jim Jagielski   Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 13:26
Jim Jagielski   Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 13:27
Ryan Bloom     RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 16:16
Aaron Bannert       Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 16:19
Ryan Bloom         RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 16:35
'Aaron Bannert'           Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 16:45
William A. Rowe, Jr.         RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 17:32
Ryan Bloom           RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 18:07
'Aaron Bannert'             Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 18:19
William A. Rowe, Jr.               RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sun, 14 Jul, 19:30
William A. Rowe, Jr.                 RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 02:20
Ryan Bloom                   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 02:54
Justin Erenkrantz                     Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 03:23
William A. Rowe, Jr.                   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 03:05
William A. Rowe, Jr.                     RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 03:38
William A. Rowe, Jr.                   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 03:36
Justin Erenkrantz                     Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 03:42
William A. Rowe, Jr.                     RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 04:56
Brian Pane                       Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 05:09
William A. Rowe, Jr.           RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 18:47
Brian Pane     Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 18:02
Ryan Bloom   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sat, 13 Jul, 16:13
Ryan Bloom   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sun, 14 Jul, 18:25
Brian Pane     Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sun, 14 Jul, 18:36
Ryan Bloom   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sun, 14 Jul, 19:56
Ryan Bloom   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sun, 14 Jul, 19:57
Brian Pane     Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sun, 14 Jul, 20:19
Cliff Woolley   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sun, 14 Jul, 20:01
Aaron Bannert     Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sun, 14 Jul, 20:36
Brian Pane       Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sun, 14 Jul, 20:41
Ryan Bloom   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sun, 14 Jul, 20:21
Ryan Bloom   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sun, 14 Jul, 20:39
William A. Rowe, Jr.     RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 02:03
Sander Striker   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Sun, 14 Jul, 20:39
Ryan Bloom   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 00:30
Ryan Bloom   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 03:09
r..@apache.org   Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 03:30
Emery Berger   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 03:40
Ryan Bloom   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 04:41
Bill Stoddard   RE: more notes on the apr_time_t issue Mon, 15 Jul, 14:54
Re: cvs commit: apr/tables apr_tables.c
Brian Pane   Re: cvs commit: apr/tables apr_tables.c Sat, 13 Jul, 07:13
Jeff Trawick   Re: cvs commit: apr/tables apr_tables.c Sat, 13 Jul, 11:45
Brian Pane     Re: cvs commit: apr/tables apr_tables.c Sat, 13 Jul, 18:09
William A. Rowe, Jr. For what it's worth, our busec implementation Sat, 13 Jul, 23:56
Brian Pane [PATCH for review and benchmarking] new implementation of apr_table Sun, 14 Jul, 01:59
Brian Pane   Re: [PATCH for review and benchmarking] new implementation of apr_table Sun, 14 Jul, 23:30
Ian Holsman IO abstraction layer for files Mon, 15 Jul, 00:53
Ryan Bloom   RE: IO abstraction layer for files Mon, 15 Jul, 02:03
Ian Holsman     Re: IO abstraction layer for files Mon, 15 Jul, 05:27
Aaron Bannert Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 02:24
Brian Pane   Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 02:27
Aaron Bannert     Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 02:35
Brian Pane       Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 02:42
Justin Erenkrantz         Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 03:56
Brian Pane           Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 04:24
William A. Rowe, Jr.       Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 04:03
Justin Erenkrantz         Why not POSIX timeval? Mon, 15 Jul, 04:37
William A. Rowe, Jr.       Faster time_now() [Was: Why not POSIX time_t?] Mon, 15 Jul, 05:04
William A. Rowe, Jr.   Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 03:03
Ryan Bloom   RE: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 03:03
Brian Pane     Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 03:17
r..@apache.org   Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 05:23
Brian Pane     Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 05:57
Ryan Bloom   RE: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 13:55
Bill Stoddard   RE: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 14:16
Bill Stoddard   RE: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 14:38
David Reid     Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 15:00
Brian Pane     Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 15:29
Ryan Bloom   RE: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 15:08
Jim Jagielski   Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 15:36
Bill Stoddard   RE: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 17:32
Brian Pane     Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 18:19
Cliff Woolley   RE: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 17:54
Bill Stoddard   RE: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 18:04
Bill Stoddard   RE: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 18:37
Brian Pane     Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 19:15
Cliff Woolley     RE: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 19:48
Brian Pane       approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 20:21
Ben Laurie         Re: approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Tue, 16 Jul, 13:51
Brian Pane           Re: approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Tue, 16 Jul, 15:45
Justin Erenkrantz       Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 20:44
William A. Rowe, Jr.     Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 20:34
Ryan Bloom   RE: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 18:53
Cliff Woolley   Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 19:29
Brian Pane     Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 19:55
Cliff Woolley   RE: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 19:53
Brian Pane     Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 19:58
Ryan Bloom   RE: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 19:56
Cliff Woolley   RE: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 19:59
Aaron Bannert [PATCH] possible optimization in apr_poll()? Mon, 15 Jul, 03:48
Ryan Bloom   Re: [PATCH] possible optimization in apr_poll()? Mon, 15 Jul, 04:34
Brian Pane     Re: [PATCH] possible optimization in apr_poll()? Mon, 15 Jul, 04:42
r..@apache.org   Re: [PATCH] possible optimization in apr_poll()? Mon, 15 Jul, 04:43
Brian Pane     Re: [PATCH] possible optimization in apr_poll()? Mon, 15 Jul, 04:51
Bill Stoddard   RE: [PATCH] possible optimization in apr_poll()? Mon, 15 Jul, 14:51
Ryan Bloom   RE: [PATCH] possible optimization in apr_poll()? Mon, 15 Jul, 15:06
r..@apache.org Re: Why not POSIX timeval? Mon, 15 Jul, 04:38
Karl Fogel [PATCH] identity tables for i18n (second chance for review) Mon, 15 Jul, 04:59
Ryan Bloom Re: Faster time_now() [Was: Why not POSIX time_t?] Mon, 15 Jul, 05:20
Ryan Bloom RE: cvs commit: apr/network_io/win32 sendrecv.c Mon, 15 Jul, 13:49
Ian Holsman ANNOUNCE : 2.0.40 is tagged Mon, 15 Jul, 16:26
Brad Nicholes network_io/win32/poll.c Mon, 15 Jul, 17:09
Ryan Bloom   RE: network_io/win32/poll.c Mon, 15 Jul, 17:16
Brad Nicholes   RE: network_io/win32/poll.c Mon, 15 Jul, 17:21
Ryan Bloom   RE: network_io/win32/poll.c Mon, 15 Jul, 17:22
Branko ─îibej Warnings in new poll code on Win32 Mon, 15 Jul, 17:52
Ed Holyat [PATCH] unix/dso.c on solaris Mon, 15 Jul, 19:22
Jeff Trawick   Re: [PATCH] unix/dso.c on solaris Thu, 18 Jul, 14:25
Re: approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t?
Cliff Woolley   Re: approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 20:24
Brian Pane     Re: approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Mon, 15 Jul, 20:32
Bill Stoddard   RE: approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Tue, 16 Jul, 17:00
Brian Pane     Re: approximating division by a million Re: Why not POSIX time_t? Tue, 16 Jul, 17:27
William A. Rowe, Jr. Removing timeout_ms field from win32 struct Mon, 15 Jul, 20:40
David Reid Earth to APR???? Mon, 15 Jul, 23:36
Ryan Bloom   RE: Earth to APR???? Mon, 15 Jul, 23:36
Cliff Woolley   Re: Earth to APR???? Mon, 15 Jul, 23:45
Brian Pane   Re: Earth to APR???? Mon, 15 Jul, 23:49
Brian Pane     a new proposal Re: Earth to APR???? Tue, 16 Jul, 00:35
Jim Jagielski   Re: Earth to APR???? Tue, 16 Jul, 00:06
Aaron Bannert   Re: Earth to APR???? Tue, 16 Jul, 04:03
William A. Rowe, Jr.   Re: Earth to APR???? Tue, 16 Jul, 04:09
Brian Pane     Re: Earth to APR???? Tue, 16 Jul, 06:23
Jim Jagielski   Re: Earth to APR???? Tue, 16 Jul, 12:38
Ryan Bloom RE: a new proposal Re: Earth to APR???? Tue, 16 Jul, 00:21
Brian Pane   Re: a new proposal Re: Earth to APR???? Tue, 16 Jul, 16:02
Karl Fogel bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' Tue, 16 Jul, 02:12
Cliff Woolley   Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' Tue, 16 Jul, 02:28
Karl Fogel     Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' Tue, 16 Jul, 03:27
Cliff Woolley   Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' Tue, 16 Jul, 03:55
Karl Fogel     Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' Tue, 16 Jul, 03:58
Ian Holsman       Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' Tue, 16 Jul, 04:12
Karl Fogel         Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' Tue, 16 Jul, 04:09
Ian Holsman           Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' Tue, 16 Jul, 05:11
Cliff Woolley   Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' Tue, 16 Jul, 04:41
Cliff Woolley   Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' Tue, 16 Jul, 04:52
Karl Fogel     Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' Tue, 16 Jul, 04:43
Cliff Woolley   Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' Tue, 16 Jul, 04:59
Cliff Woolley   Re: bogus compiler warnings in macros that take `socket' Tue, 16 Jul, 05:15
Message list« Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Jul 201439
Jun 201445
May 201445
Apr 201464
Mar 201420
Feb 201417
Jan 201470
Dec 201343
Nov 2013124
Oct 2013102
Sep 201335
Aug 201339
Jul 201315
Jun 201341
May 201356
Apr 201338
Mar 201377
Feb 201314
Jan 201317
Dec 201215
Nov 201221
Oct 201222
Sep 201268
Aug 201249
Jul 201232
Jun 201216
May 201220
Apr 201293
Mar 201243
Feb 201290
Jan 201299
Dec 201194
Nov 201118
Oct 201129
Sep 201144
Aug 201126
Jul 201168
Jun 201173
May 2011181
Apr 2011140
Mar 2011124
Feb 201168
Jan 201130
Dec 201048
Nov 201038
Oct 2010153
Sep 201056
Aug 201043
Jul 201050
Jun 201044
May 201057
Apr 2010100
Mar 2010120
Feb 201097
Jan 2010100
Dec 2009165
Nov 200986
Oct 2009184
Sep 2009108
Aug 2009121
Jul 2009169
Jun 2009177
May 200941
Apr 200961
Mar 2009186
Feb 2009102
Jan 2009117
Dec 200848
Nov 200872
Oct 200858
Sep 200850
Aug 2008115
Jul 2008196
Jun 2008325
May 2008404
Apr 2008151
Mar 200844
Feb 200855
Jan 200859
Dec 2007127
Nov 2007232
Oct 2007286
Sep 2007156
Aug 2007147
Jul 2007138
Jun 2007134
May 200791
Apr 2007105
Mar 2007121
Feb 2007134
Jan 2007219
Dec 2006122
Nov 2006167
Oct 2006150
Sep 2006179
Aug 2006174
Jul 2006165
Jun 2006326
May 2006295
Apr 2006317
Mar 2006267
Feb 2006207
Jan 2006190
Dec 2005105
Nov 2005153
Oct 2005124
Sep 2005143
Aug 2005213
Jul 2005107
Jun 200589
May 2005141
Apr 2005107
Mar 2005197
Feb 2005102
Jan 2005246
Dec 2004197
Nov 2004226
Oct 200489
Sep 2004216
Aug 2004225
Jul 2004295
Jun 2004336
May 2004228
Apr 2004152
Mar 2004271
Feb 2004227
Jan 2004148
Dec 2003126
Nov 2003154
Oct 200397
Sep 2003176
Aug 2003124
Jul 2003104
Jun 2003162
May 2003120
Apr 2003167
Mar 2003272
Feb 2003226
Jan 2003218
Dec 2002333
Nov 2002162
Oct 2002211
Sep 2002240
Aug 2002329
Jul 2002698
Jun 2002236
May 2002266
Apr 2002271
Mar 2002283
Feb 2002203
Jan 2002357
Dec 2001276
Nov 2001253
Oct 2001160
Sep 2001412
Aug 2001462
Jul 2001811
Jun 2001533
May 2001388
Apr 2001223
Mar 2001191
Feb 2001472
Jan 2001356
Dec 2000457
Nov 2000283