Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 1528 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2002 00:50:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 1516 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2002 00:50:38 -0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.0.2006 Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 17:50:40 -0700 Subject: AF_UNIX sockets in APR... From: Pier Fumagalli To: APR Development List Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3D47057B.5080002@apache.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N While at OSCON, I chatted about having AF_UNIX support in APR with a bunch of you, and I didn't hear any negative opinion from anyone... This would be so great for me, as it would ease my work with Java, in having a generic IO layer a little bit better than the current Java.IO and with an extensive support for all kinds of sockets... Are there strong feelings against it? Thanks... Pier