Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 54749 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2002 13:26:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 54738 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2002 13:26:25 -0000 From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <200207131326.JAA01873@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue To: bpane@pacbell.net (Brian Pane) Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:26:18 -0400 (EDT) Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com In-Reply-To: <1026541348.2266.51.camel@localhost> from "Brian Pane" at Jul 12, 2002 11:22:28 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Brian Pane wrote: > > > > > apr_dsec_t mytime = apr_time_now(); > > What's an apr_dsec_t? > I would assume a 'decimal' sec rather than binary sec -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson