Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 69396 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2002 18:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 69385 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2002 18:36:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:36:06 -0700 From: Aaron Bannert To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) Message-ID: <20020712183605.GN18710@clove.org> Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bannert , dev@apr.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Let's try to get a consensus. This is my proposal. There are other proposals like it, but this one is mine. Please restrict discussion to this proposal. Two questions, multiple choice: 1) apr_butime_t - binary useconds since the epoch (absolute time) [ ] +1, I support this. [ ] 0, I don't care (I abstain). [ ] -1, I don't like this because _____ [technical veto explanation]. 2) apr_busec_t - binary useconds since some arbitrary time (relative time) [ ] +1, I support this. [ ] 0, I don't care (I abstain). [ ] -1, I don't like this because _____ [technical veto explanation].