Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 78616 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2002 18:45:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 78601 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2002 18:45:56 -0000 Mailbox-Line: From dreid@jetnet.co.uk Fri Jul 12 19:45:59 2002 Message-ID: <008401c229d4$9751c800$7500a8c0@goliath> From: "David Reid" To: "APR Dev List" References: <20020712183605.GN18710@clove.org> <20020712114202.B1355@apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:47:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none version=2.31 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Agreed, it's premature. There may have been volumes of discussion but little of it seems to have addressed the problems. Can someone simply restate what issue needs fixing. No more hand waving or IRC chats, a simple email explaining the issue and what needs fixed. david > On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:36:06AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > Let's try to get a consensus. This is my proposal. There are other > > proposals like it, but this one is mine. Please restrict discussion > > to this proposal. > > What is this for? > > I don't think we've settled whether we want an abstract or > concrete implementation to represent time. > > Until we settle that, I believe this is premature. -- justin > > >