"Ryan Bloom" <rbb@covalent.net> writes:

> > From: trawick@rdu88-250-182.nc.rr.com [mailto:trawick@rdu88-250-
> > 
> > A little bird told me that FD_ZERO() burns lots of cycles in
> > apr_wait_for_io_or_timeout().  It turns out that this is an easy
> > conversion to poll(), which doesn't have such overhead in the
> > interface.
> > 
> > This works for me with some testing (timeouts on read and write work
> > for me).
> 
> Can we remove the #ifdef's by just using apr_poll here?

I'd rather we not, since that introduces a fair amount of extra
overhead.

-- 
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net
Born in Roswell... married an alien...