At 04:34 AM 7/10/2002, INOUE Seiichiro wrote:

Thank you for submitting the patch.  We took a slightly different approach,
since some unix common and accessor code rightly [but incorrectly]
assumed that timeout was in usec.

Instead we've reverted to the APR definition of usec's for timeout, and
added a timeout_ms just for millisecond tracking.

Your identification of this problem is very much appreciated, I've credited
Tanaka as the discoverer of this bug in APR's CREDITS.

Yours,

Bill