apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From cmpil...@collab.net
Subject apr-util #define confusion.
Date Mon, 22 Jul 2002 16:09:51 GMT
Glancing through apr-util/xlate/xlate.c, I see tests and uses of both
APU_HAVE_APR_ICONV and APU_HAS_APR_ICONV.  I'm not aware of the
conventions in place for choosing HAVE vs. HAS -- can someone fill me
in here?  Or, if no such conventions exist, are just there bugs in
that code?

Thanks.

Mime
View raw message