apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@attglobal.net>
Subject Re: [design] work around new apr_poll leakage?
Date Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:52:53 GMT
"Ryan Bloom" <rbb@covalent.net> writes:

> No, the old design was completely bogus.  As proof, Trawick vetoed even
> using the damned thing inside of APR.

I listed two conditions for the veto:

  1) something more complex than calling poll() in that situation
  2) something slower than calling poll() in that situation

It seems to me that the current code meets both conditions, though
not as obnoxiously as code using the older apr_poll() interface would
have.

-- 
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net
Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Mime
View raw message