apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cliff Woolley <jwool...@virginia.edu>
Subject Re: Why not POSIX time_t?
Date Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:29:11 GMT
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Brian Pane wrote:

>     (seconds << 20) + microseconds

Yeah, but addition and subtraction of the resulting scalars would require
just as many carry/underflow checks as a structure would...

I mean, that's all that really is: a bitfield.

--Cliff


Mime
View raw message