apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cliff Woolley <jwool...@virginia.edu>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS
Date Thu, 11 Jul 2002 21:34:23 GMT
On 11 Jul 2002 aaron@apache.org wrote:

>   +         -1: aaron [veto for reusing the apr_time_t identifier for a new use.
>   +                    I'm ok with apr_timeval_t.]

If we're avoiding apr_time_t because of confusion with the POSIX time_t,
it makes no sense whatsoever to use "apr_timeval_t" either, since POSIX
also defines "struct timeval" (with a seconds component and a usecs
component).

--Cliff


Mime
View raw message