apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cliff Woolley <jwool...@virginia.edu>
Subject RE: [PATCH] example BUSEC patch for benchmarking only
Date Thu, 11 Jul 2002 03:01:58 GMT
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:

> > It's definitely a valid optimization.  I just checked gcc on
> > Sparc and it generates a shift rather than a division.  But
> I've not looked at the generated code, but profiling indicates that an
> additional division is happening, adding an extra 231 instructions.
> (xlc_r -O2)

Note that even gcc will only do this optimization if -fstrength-reduce is
specified (granted, for gcc that optimization is turned on automatically
with -O2 and -O3).


View raw message