apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Roy T. Fielding" <field...@apache.org>
Subject why apr_size_t?
Date Thu, 11 Jul 2002 22:24:21 GMT
As near as I can tell from looking at the code and cvs logs, the only
reason we have apr_size_t and apr_ssize_t is because win32 wants to
define apr_ssize_t.  Is that because win32 doesn't have ssize_t?
Is there a reason why we don't simply define ssize_t on that platform?


View raw message