apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] proposal for names of new binary usec impl(s)
Date Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:15:49 GMT
Actually, it's also out of line.  If we have a vote in CVS, or even another
vote present, you really shouldn't go instigating more confusing or
conflicting votes to track, especially if it's not your proposal or patch.

And no, we haven't settled abstract or concrete contracts for the time
scale, so no, it's hard to pick a name.

The votes are in status.  Let's keep discussion on list and the tally
in STATUS.  STATUS cannot continue to be a soapbox, and remain
an effective summary of where the project is at.  If someone wants to
start tracking a discussion in another cvs file (preferably the apr site
or pmc repository, rather than our code repositories), that's fine by me.

Can we please end this sub-thread?

Bill

At 01:47 PM 7/12/2002, David Reid wrote:
>Agreed, it's premature.
>
>david
>
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:36:06AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > > Let's try to get a consensus. This is my proposal. There are other
> > > proposals like it, but this one is mine. Please restrict discussion
> > > to this proposal.
> >
> > What is this for?
> >
> > I don't think we've settled whether we want an abstract or
> > concrete implementation to represent time.
> >
> > Until we settle that, I believe this is premature.  -- justin



Mime
View raw message