apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Marr <gr...@alum.wpi.edu>
Subject Re: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only
Date Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:56:33 GMT
At 10:27 AM 07/11/2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>Greg Marr wrote:
> > I keep thinking that APR_USEC_PER_SEC should be (1 << 20), or now
> > (1 << APR_USEC_BITS) instead of the magical constant.  I have no 
> way
> > of verifying with a quick glance that 1048576 is really 2^20.
> >
>
>It is :)

Well, yes, I did check it, but it's not immediately obvious.  :)

-- 
Greg Marr
gregm@alum.wpi.edu
"We thought you were dead."
"I was, but I'm better now." - Sheridan, "The Summoning"


Mime
View raw message