apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject [PATCH] example BUSEC patch for benchmarking only
Date Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:50:10 GMT
At 01:14 PM 7/9/2002, you wrote:
>Bill Stoddard wrote:
>>
>>Where and when was the post that described this proposal?  I'd like to take
>>a look. Is there a patch?
>
>There's no patch that I know of, but here's the thread with wrowe's
>original proposal for the binary microseconds design:
>  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apr-dev&m=102376298728487&w=2

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apr-dev&m=102383695930036&w=2

is a better link to some example macros.

>With the big batch of changes that I made last week, almost all
>of the time-related code in the httpd now uses the new macros--
>apr_time_sec(), apr_time_usec(), etc--instead of multiplying and
>dividing by 1,000,000 directly.  Hopefully that will make it
>easier to try out a new time representation.

Agreed.  But even discounting that USEC_PER_SEC is used for
it's real meaning somewhere, and would introduce slight discrepancies,
attached is simply the gross hack to force busec units.

Note the 'right' change is to have a BUSEC_PER_SEC constant,
but this is a truer test for benchmarking.

Bill





Mime
View raw message