apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko ─îibej <br...@xbc.nu>
Subject Re: Is --enable-utf8 working everywhere?
Date Wed, 17 Jul 2002 04:23:01 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> At 10:42 PM 7/16/2002, =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= wrote:
>> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> I'm 100% behind requiring win32 users to download apr-iconv as part
>>> of their apr build.  Be done with the custom tweakish build stuff 
>>> already,
>>> this is 2002.  We need xlate :-)
>> I dunno. You can use apr without apr-util; you should be able to use 
>> it without apr-iconv, too. And use apr-iconv without apr-util. And 
>> apr-util without apr-iconv (apr_md5 can work without iconv, after all).
> Seriously?  Nah.
> If a win32 user wants to build apr-util, let them build apr-iconv in 
> with it.
> You are only asking for a STUB, right?  Doesn't have to do anything?

No no no no!

> So if we have the base libapriconv.dll working tommorow, you are happy?
> No codepages need be loaded for your alpha 1?  Nobody seriously expected
> Win32 to users to have iconv.dll installed on their PC?

We need full apr_xlate functionality, that was the whole point of the 
exercise. I seriously expect people to get libiconv-1.8 sources and drop 
them into their APR source tree f they want to build Subversion Alpha.

Brane ─îibej   <brane@xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/

View raw message