apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apr/threadproc/win32 proc.c
Date Tue, 02 Jul 2002 23:21:59 GMT
Incidentally, I'm beginning to suspect that the root cause of the 
problem wasn't the patch itself, but the fact that apr_file_inherit_set 
is a noop.

BTW, why are the apr_*_inherit set functions declared void, not 
apr_status_t?


Branko Čibej wrote:

> brane@apache.org wrote:
>
>> brane       2002/07/02 15:25:52
>>
>>  Modified:    threadproc/win32 proc.c
>>  Log:
>>  Reverting the 1.76 and 1.77 changes, because they didn't work.
>>  The child handles weren't properly inheritable, and redirected command
>>  output got lost in the bit bucket.
>>
>
> There was a nice comment in that code about why we couldn't use 
> apr_file_dup. Anyway, I'm looking at the handle leaks right now.
>
>


-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane@xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/


Mime
View raw message