apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>
Subject Re: more notes on the apr_time_t issue
Date Sat, 13 Jul 2002 16:19:26 GMT
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 09:16:17AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> I really hate where our time implementation is going.  It used to be
> VERY simple, and easy to modify and use.  From looking at this
> conversation, it sounds like we are about to go to a VERY complex
> implementation that is hard to modify and use.  :-(

Agreed that complexity is bad. I don't think we need more than one
system of time in APR*.


*I'm not opposed to having two during a transition phase, but with
our set of requirements we should be able to come up with one (and
I think we already have, no?).

View raw message