apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only
Date Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:27:35 GMT
Greg Marr wrote:
> 
> At 01:33 AM 07/11/2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >Ok, attached is the code redone as binary math.  I'm tired, could be 
> >any number of major blunders in it, but on first pass, it looked right.
> >
> >-/** number of microseconds per second */
> >-#define APR_USEC_PER_SEC APR_TIME_C(1000000)
> >+/** number of binary microseconds per second (2^20) */
> >+#define APR_USEC_PER_SEC APR_TIME_C(1048576)
> >+#define APR_USEC_BITS 20
> 
> I keep thinking that APR_USEC_PER_SEC should be (1 << 20), or now
> (1 << APR_USEC_BITS) instead of the magical constant.  I have no way 
> of verifying with a quick glance that 1048576 is really 2^20.
> 

It is :)

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Mime
View raw message