apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tony Finch <...@dotat.at>
Subject Re: next steps for changing apr_time_t?
Date Mon, 08 Jul 2002 16:46:40 GMT
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:20:24AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> 
> I am strongly opposed to reusing the apr_time_t identifier.

I note that apr_time_t is a bad name in the first place, because POSIX
reserves all names ending in _t for the implementation. Feel free to
ignore this exceedingly irritating naming rule :-)

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
FAIR ISLE: CYCLONIC BECOMING SOUTHERLY 5 TO 7, BACKING SOUTHEASTERLY 3 OR 4
LATER. RAIN AT TIMES. MODERATE OR POOR BECOMING GOOD.

Mime
View raw message