apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>
Subject Re: next steps for changing apr_time_t?
Date Mon, 08 Jul 2002 08:20:24 GMT
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:46:04AM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
>     How much will this impact other APR-based apps (SVN, Flood, etc),
>     and is now a good time to break things?
>     Should the new data type still be called apr_time_t?  (My own
>     preference is to change the name so that existing applications
>     will break predictably at compile time rather than unpredictably
>     at run time.)

I am strongly opposed to reusing the apr_time_t identifier. In my mind,
we should do the two things separately: 1) create and start using
binary usecs, and 2) decide* how to deprecate the apr_time_t interface.

*This is all a matter of how nice we want to be. I'm leaning toward
keeping the apr_time_t interface for awhile. Another good option might
be to cause some compile-time breakage that makes the change obvious.


View raw message