apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ryan Bloom" <...@covalent.net>
Subject RE: Apache 2 instruction count profile (head as of ~15:00 EDT July 10)
Date Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:57:59 GMT
<Forwarding from dev@httpd>

This is about the apr_poll implementation.  The new implementation seems
to have an impact on performance.

Ryan

----------------------------------------------
Ryan Bloom                  rbb@covalent.net
645 Howard St.              rbb@apache.org
San Francisco, CA 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:rbb@covalent.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:55 PM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Apache 2 instruction count profile (head as of ~15:00 EDT
> July 10)
> 
> > From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:bill@wstoddard.com]
> >
> > This is with Ryan's poll patch and some of my patches to mod_cache
and
> > mod_mem_cache (which I will publish later on).  Unfortuanetely the
> results
> > are difficult to compare with earlier results because my test tree
was
> > just
> > too polluted with patches for Ryan's patch to cleanly apply.  Still,
> the
> > overall direction is good (7.5% reduction in instruction count). The
> > difference between Jeff's wait_for_timeout and Ryan's is noise in
this
> > comparison. However, I suspect the apr_poll() is better in general
and
> is
> > contributing to the improvement.
> 
> Based on these numbers, I would like to commit the new apr_poll()
today.
> This is likely to break everything but Unix for a few days however.
> Once the code is committed, there are some obvious performance
> improvements that can still be made.  The first, is to use a static
> array for small poll sets, or use alloca on systems that have it.  The
> second is to go through Apache and remove the functions that used to
> setup poll sets.  That will actually have an impact on all of the Unix
> MPMs, because we will finally be able to stop re-inserting the same
> socket into the pollset for every request.
> 
> Does anybody have a problem with this plan?  I would like to commit
late
> this evening, which will give me enough time to fix Windows tonight
> (hopefully).
> 
> Ryan
> 



Mime
View raw message