apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cliff Woolley <jwool...@virginia.edu>
Subject Re: Breaking something? Now is the time?
Date Fri, 28 Jun 2002 18:22:19 GMT
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> If Cliff wants to commit the semantic change to apr_table_[v]do, I'll
> +1 here and raise you a _NONSTD correction.  Along with Sander's
> changes to make the unsafe transparent apr_allocator.h structure
> opaque, I'd say we have a bit of worthwhile breakage to inflict before
> we go on. By the way, 99.5% of coders will be unaffected by any of
> these three changes. They can take advantage of the apr_table_[v]do
> change or ignore it.

So you didn't indicate an opinion on whether the existing semantics of
apr_table_vdo() match their documentation, and if not, whether it's the
docs or the implementation that have it right.  I need to know in order to
proceed with the return-type change.

Thanks...

--Cliff


Mime
View raw message