apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: Breaking something? Now is the time?
Date Fri, 28 Jun 2002 18:35:17 GMT
At 01:22 PM 6/28/2002, you wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > If Cliff wants to commit the semantic change to apr_table_[v]do, I'll
> > +1 here and raise you a _NONSTD correction.  Along with Sander's
> > changes to make the unsafe transparent apr_allocator.h structure
> > opaque, I'd say we have a bit of worthwhile breakage to inflict before
> > we go on. By the way, 99.5% of coders will be unaffected by any of
> > these three changes. They can take advantage of the apr_table_[v]do
> > change or ignore it.
>
>So you didn't indicate an opinion on whether the existing semantics of
>apr_table_vdo() match their documentation, and if not, whether it's the
>docs or the implementation that have it right.  I need to know in order to
>proceed with the return-type change.

IMHO, the implementation is what people have tested, not the documented
behavior.  Use the source, luke :-)



Mime
View raw message