apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thom May <t...@planetarytramp.net>
Subject Re: Packaging/version question
Date Thu, 20 Jun 2002 20:55:21 GMT
* Ryan Bloom (rbb@covalent.net) wrote :
> Feel free, but I don't think we want to actually tag or release that
> version in CVS.  If we tag that, it becomes something of an official
> release, which means we have to support it.  I would much rather see us
> put the effort forth to make APR release quality and release it.
> 
+1
-Thom

> Ryan
> 
> ----------------------------------------------
> Ryan Bloom                  rbb@covalent.net
> 645 Howard St.              rbb@apache.org
> San Francisco, CA 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joe Orton [mailto:jorton@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:56 PM
> > To: dev@apr.apache.org
> > Subject: Packaging/version question
> > 
> > Hi folks.  For creating binary packages of APR and APR-util, would it
> be
> > acceptable to use package versions of "0.9" until an official APR
> > release is made, since I've seen talk of the first release being
> "1.0"?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > joe

-- 
Thom May -> thom@planetarytramp.net

"Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
 has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall

Mime
View raw message