Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-6398-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 64595 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2002 12:13:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:dev@apr.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@apr.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@apr.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dev-subscribe@apr.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 64584 invoked from network); 1 May 2002 12:13:26 -0000
X-Authentication-Warning: rdu88-250-035.nc.rr.com: trawick set sender to
 trawick@attglobal.net using -f
Sender: trawick@rdu88-250-035.nc.rr.com
To: INOUE Seiichiro <inoue@ariel-networks.com>
Cc: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Q] apr_time_exp_get() difference between Unix and Win32
References: <20020423.004842.122624738.inoue@ariel-networks.com>
From: Jeff Trawick <trawick@attglobal.net>
Date: 01 May 2002 08:08:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20020423.004842.122624738.inoue@ariel-networks.com>
Message-ID: <m3r8kw5auw.fsf@rdu88-250-035.nc.rr.com>
Lines: 14
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

INOUE Seiichiro <inoue@ariel-networks.com> writes:

> apr_time_exp_get() (a.k.a. apr_implode_time()) has a weird difference between Unix and Win32.
> Only on Win32, it has
>     days -= xt->tm_gmtoff;
> 
> Is this a bug?
> Or, a platform dependent code?

good question!

-- 
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net
Born in Roswell... married an alien...