Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 97590 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2002 01:12:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 97560 invoked from network); 30 May 2002 01:12:30 -0000 From: "Sander Striker" To: Cc: Subject: Renames pending, WAS: RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker worker.c Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 03:20:42 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:jwoolley@virginia.edu] > Sent: 30 May 2002 02:41 [...] > > Log: > > Catch up with the apr_allocator_set_owner -> apr_allocator_owner_set renames > > in APR. > > This requires an MMN bump (which is fine with me, since we've already done > one in 2.0.37-dev, and I'm starting to see little point in going back > now). If there are other renames of this sort, we should get them in all > at once. What about these: apr_pool_set_abort apr_pool_get_abort apr_pool_get_parent And the ones left in renames_pending? Also, Thom May posted a long list of suggestions a while back. Noone seems to have responded to that. Sander