Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 63991 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2002 21:52:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 63979 invoked from network); 12 May 2002 21:52:50 -0000 Errors-To: Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020512164508.020142e8@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Sender: wrowe%rowe-clan.net@pop3.rowe-clan.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 16:46:36 -0500 To: dev@apr.apache.org From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: Outch, or getting to the last mile In-Reply-To: <3CDEDE3D.8090306@xbc.nu> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020511174016.00b8c468@pop3.rowe-clan.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 04:27 PM 5/12/2002, brane wrote: >William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >apr/i18n/unix/utf8_ucs2.c -> apr/i18n/win32/utf8_ucs2.c [private] >> >>apr/i18n/unix/xlate.c -> apr-util/i18n/xlate.c >> >>would this satisfy everyone? > >+1, assuming utf8 <-> wchar_t conversion is still available on all platforms. With a caviat... that needs to remain in apr. We rely on utf8 <> wchar on win32 internally. Folks requested that the symbols for utf conversion not be exported or publicly used, when I introduced them (relying on the apr_xlate_* family instead.) Has this position changed?