Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 25401 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2002 14:54:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 25344 invoked from network); 16 May 2002 14:54:46 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 07:54:48 -0700 From: Aaron Bannert To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] WIN32 implementations of apr_thread_cond_timedwait + apr_thread_cond_wait Message-ID: <20020516075448.X14245@clove.org> Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bannert , dev@apr.apache.org References: <20020515214033.16511.qmail@web20509.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020515214033.16511.qmail@web20509.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 02:40:33PM -0700, JF B wrote: > --- apr/locks/win32/thread_cond.c Wed Mar 13 15:39:22 2002 > +++ apr_new/locks/win32/thread_cond.c Wed May 8 18:25:52 2002 ... Cool! Could you explain why you thought apr_thread_cond_wait() needed to be altered? I'll try to give this an eyeball review later today. -aaron