From dev-return-6404-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Wed May 01 18:01:43 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 36348 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2002 18:01:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 36337 invoked from network); 1 May 2002 18:01:43 -0000 Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 11:01:47 -0700 From: Aaron Bannert To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr configure.in CHANGES Message-ID: <20020501110147.S14899@clove.org> Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bannert , dev@apr.apache.org References: <20020428074934.47728.qmail@icarus.apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020428074934.47728.qmail@icarus.apache.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 07:49:34AM -0000, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > jerenkrantz 02/04/28 00:49:34 > > Modified: . configure.in CHANGES > Log: > Not all platforms can mmap /dev/zero, so we need to do an explicit check > for that. If that were to fail, then make it appear as /dev/zero never > existed in the first place. > > PR: 8537 Sorry for the late reply. Do we have a HAVE_DEV_ZERO-like define somewhere, and if so would this mean that an OS that had /dev/zero but didn't support mmap(/dev/zero) would not have that defined anymore? Other than that I think this is a good way to test for mmap(/dev/zero). -aaron