From dev-return-6155-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Thu Apr 04 21:24:01 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 20670 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2002 21:24:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 20632 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2002 21:24:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 13:24:06 -0800 From: Aaron Bannert To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr/locks/unix crossproc.c locks.c proc_mutex.c Message-ID: <20020404132406.U1154@clove.org> Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bannert , dev@apr.apache.org References: <20020404183357.15053.qmail@icarus.apache.org> <20020404125010.T1154@clove.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 04:04:46PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > You should hard-code posix semaphores for Darwin in apr_hints.m4. We > should not be playing around with the lock choice and affecting > multiple systems when we get specific platform knowledge we want to > exploit. apr_hints.m4 is for that specific platform knowledge. I don't consider this to be platform specific knowledge. Posix semaphores can be used on other platforms as well (Jim said he tested it on Solaris). So is sem_open() broken on linux 2.2.12 or is it just being used incorrectly? -aaron