apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pier Fumagalli <p...@betaversion.org>
Subject Re: RedHat comments on APR using /usr/include/asm/atomic.h
Date Mon, 29 Apr 2002 22:31:58 GMT
"Blair Zajac" <blair@orcaware.com> wrote:

> There are some interesting comments from a RedHat developer on why
> APR should not include /usr/include/asm/atomic.h on Linux platforms
> at line 160 of apr/include/apr_atomic.h
> 
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63643
> 
> Maybe someone more familiar with the atomic code should take a
> look at it.

So, at the end, did we decide to keep atomic or to drop them? I have some
code relying on those for the WebApp module and would like to know whether I
have to patch it and use intra-process locks or just leave it as is :)

Thanks for hints :)

    Pier

--
I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S.
President.                                                 B.W. Fitzpatrick



Mime
View raw message