apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@lyra.org>
Subject Re: useless return values for apr_md5_*() functions...
Date Sat, 13 Apr 2002 02:05:02 GMT
It has absolute NOTHING to do with when we chose GA. If we chose GA three
months from now, we'd still have these issues.

Calling the server GA is selecting a point in time. There is nothing to say
that the particular point we chose is worse than next year.

To the naysayers about calling it GA: feh. There is no way we could stay in
this mode of "just one more fix." "oh, just one more tweak."


On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 12:29:47AM +0100, David Reid wrote:
> Yeah well, maybe if we'd actually paused an thought before jumping into the
> GA we'd be in better shape rather than approaching SNAFU.
> david
> > -> This is quite an API change - soon after products
> > which rely on it have gone GA. Which is a patent
> > way to get breakage - and I seen o compelling need
> > for the systems in production today. I guess we need
> > a fork/branching and versioning story there.

Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/

View raw message