apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Stoddard" <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject Re: apr_bucket_file_create() args...
Date Tue, 02 Apr 2002 04:14:49 GMT

> It would be, except that we won't handle more than ONE size_t's worth
> of data at a time within a single bucket.
> The patch to normalize to one size_t's worth of data took a 71 line delta.
> The patch to normalize to any off_t's worth of data was at 500 lines and
> growing when I gave up.
> I've said it a dozen times on list, when someone writes a patch that
> builds clean [and is correct, I suppose there is a distinction there :-]
> then I'll entertain the change.  I'm not surprised there have been no
> takers, I tried myself long before I gave up and worked in size_t's.
> Note that sendfile would -never- succeed on more than a size_t's
> worth ... for that matter, I believe the cap is 56MB by one of the
> IBM coder's own experiments.

Humm... I would be suprised if sendfile has a limit like this. If it does, then it is a
bug in the OS IMHO. In principle, sendfile should work on any file supported by the OS...


> At 09:48 PM 4/1/2002, you wrote:
> >This looks broken to me (at least on Windows). apr_off_t is an int64 and
> >apr_size_t is an
> >int.
> >
> >APU_DECLARE(apr_bucket *) apr_bucket_file_create(apr_file_t *fd,
> >                                                  apr_off_t offset,
> >                                                  apr_size_t len,
> > apr_pool_t *p,
> >                                                  apr_bucket_alloc_t *list)
> >
> >I think both the len and offset should be apr_off_t.
> >
> >Bill

View raw message