Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 81866 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2001 01:19:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 81855 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2001 01:19:28 -0000 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 17:19:35 -0800 From: Justin Erenkrantz To: Ian Holsman Cc: dev@apr.apache.org, Brian Pane Subject: Re: Good performance results from Sander's pool patch Message-ID: <20011212011935.GC1439@ebuilt.com> References: <3C0D87E8.4070205@cnet.com> <3C16A0A9.9040100@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C16A0A9.9040100@apache.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.2i X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1-pre3 (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 04:11:21PM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote: > would anyone mind too much if I add some purify hooks into > the pool code? (sanders & current) They will be #ifdef'd > this will help in our internal debugging efforts, and anyone > else who uses purify. How about we get the new code in first? =) -- justin