apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@attglobal.net>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apr Makefile.in
Date Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:34:09 GMT
Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@ebuilt.com> writes:

> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:41:18PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > Shortly after these commits I get the following on a system with libtool
> > 1.3.4.  Coincidence?
> 
> Probably not.  ...
... 
> 1) Is it possible you have --disable-shared turned on?  I'm not

nope

>    sure if this would affect libtool, but it might turn off 
>    dependency checks.  All we want to do is populate the 
>    dependency_libs variable in libapr(util).la.  Passing the 
>    library names at link-time seems to be the way to do it.
>    In addition, these variables could also be passed on to the 
>    linker which could in theory barf on them when building a
>    static library.  I just don't know.  (What OS is this?)

Linux

> 2) It is possible that the dependency generation of older
>    libtools is broken.  I'd suggest that the benefit of
>    upgrading to this scheme (i.e. removing export_vars.sh
>    and relying on libtool to handle it) is worth forcing
>    developers to upgrade to whatever version has correct
>    dependency handling (my guess would be libtool 1.4+).

I don't have a big problem with upgrading.  Somebody needs to figure
out what libtool we really require now and go fix the version checking
logic in buildconf.

-- 
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site:
       http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
             Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Mime
View raw message