apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkra...@ebuilt.com>
Subject Re: APR_HAS_CREATE_LOCKS_NP not defined where it should be
Date Sat, 29 Dec 2001 19:46:51 GMT
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 09:49:23AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> I would prefer moving to a situation where the function that allows
> you to specify the implementation is always available and
> APR_LOCK_DEFAULT is always available.
> 
> One way to do that:
> 
> . get rid of apr_lock_create_np() and apr_proc_mutex_create_np()
> 
> . add new required parameter to apr_lock_create() and
>   apr_proc_mutex_create() for specifying implementation (expecting
>   most callers to pass APR_LOCK_DEFAULT)

I was about to say the same thing (even had a message written last
night to that effect).  So, +1.  -- justin


Mime
View raw message