Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 66597 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2001 13:32:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 66586 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2001 13:32:54 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: rdu163-40-092.nc.rr.com: trawick set sender to trawick@attglobal.net using -f Sender: trawick@rdu163-40-092.nc.rr.com To: Ian Holsman Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: Mutli-DBM patch References: <1006904850.11657.54.camel@griffon.cnet.com> From: Jeff Trawick Date: 28 Nov 2001 08:32:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1006904850.11657.54.camel@griffon.cnet.com> Message-ID: Lines: 27 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ian Holsman writes: > (inline as well as attached) > This is my first foray into AutoConf.. so this is why I'm posting the patch > it defines there new #defines APU_HAVE_XDBM. > there is also a new dbm open function _open_ex(...) to specify the DBM > later all also add a specific open call for each DBM > > So .. please comment.. As far as autoconf usage, it looks reasonable to me... Any reason why the type parameter passed to the new open function is char * instead of an enum? Is there a way for apps to be aware of the APU_HAVE_foo capabilities? (I don't think this has to be solved immediately.) Some will want to know what choices they should offer their users. I guess having a char * type lets the app pass it straight from a configuration directive to apr-util with no knowledge on the part of the app. -- Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/ Born in Roswell... married an alien...