From dev-return-4840-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Thu Nov 15 05:52:10 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 15752 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2001 05:52:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 15741 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2001 05:52:09 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU: jcw5q owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 00:52:19 -0500 (EST) From: Cliff Woolley X-X-Sender: To: Ryan Bloom cc: Subject: Re: segv after client closes connection In-Reply-To: <20011115051238.626C446DFD@koj.rkbloom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote: > Okay, I found a patch that solves the problem for me. Cliff, please > test and let me know if it fixes your problem. I am also not sure > that I like this patch. But, I will post it here and let people > comment. I'm running the tests on this. But doesn't it break some of the guarantees that pools make? Normally, you'd expect in a subpool cleanup that structures allocated in the parent pool would still be valid. With this patch, that's no longer the case. Seems like bad mojo to me... --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley cliffwoolley@yahoo.com Charlottesville, VA